You are looking at posts that were written in the month of November in the year 2008.
Posted on November 28th, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Answer_42 wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2:33 pm, thea wrote:
>
>
>
> Why do people even bother to reply to thea?
>
> Everything she mentions in this post have been explained and refuted
> to her a gazillion times… She clearly is hopeless. If only she had
> some new arguments…
>
You are not questioning everything you are hearing. You are accepting
answers that appear to be something - that 1,000 years from now will be
found to be *quack* science.
Why don’t you question more?
I cannot believe that everyone has been so brainwashed as to believe that
everything we are hearing that says *science* is true and everything we hear
about *Christianity* is false.
Something ain’t right - and it ain’t me that’s not doing the questioning?
> _____________________
> ______________
> All children are atheists — they have no idea of God.
> — Baron d’Holbach
> >
>
Posted on November 28th, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
On Nov 28, 1:18 pm, Answer_42 wrote:
> Do I need to?
> How many christian texts were written at the time? Only 27? More?
Oooops… Of course it should have been:
> How many christian texts were written at THAT time? Only 27? More?
___________________________________
All children are atheists — they have no idea of God.
Posted on November 28th, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
On Nov 28, 1:49 pm, Alan Wostenberg wrote:
> If you are not thinking of God as Infinite Being, then we are not
> thinking about the same thing, and the god whom you lack belief is not
> the God in whom we believe, but something else. Term definitions are
> not a matter of proof, for they are neither true nor false, merely
> clear or unclear. God is defined as Infinite Being.
One more time, a theist totally misses the piont and rants about a
totlly different subject.
This was not about me.
I asked YOU to prove that YOUR god is infinite.
Not to tell me that the god I lack belief in is not the same god you
believe in (Which si totally ridiculous, by the way.) and to then
reiterate that your god is infinite by definition.
> You wonder if a plurality of Infinite Beings is possible. Consider
> that to have two beings one must posess something the other lacks,
Why?
How does that even make sense as some sort of premise?
> othrewise they would be the /same/ being. But Infinite Being is by
> definition lacking in nothing. Consequently there can be at most, one.
When did “infinity” become equivalent with “not lacking anything”???
Why do many theists always redefine words as they go along?
___________________________________
All children are atheists — they have no idea of God.