You are looking at posts that were written in the month of July in the year 2008.
Posted on July 31st, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
Huh? It is accepted theory that the entire human race may have a common
ancestor; a specific female. It is possible that this female may have been
monogamous.
On 7/31/08, Drafterman wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 31, 4:23 pm, tuns o fun wrote:
> > If the Bible is allowed to be used in argument a christian can almost
> > always win though it can be made tough (but something can always be
> > pulled out of a 2000 page book that supports any view). I would like
> > to see an argument (with proof stated) of whether or nto the bible is
> > a legitimate historical document.
>
> No. The human race would not have survived if descended from only two
> individuals.
>
> The End.
> >
>
Posted on July 31st, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
Too bad for you if a gang of demons decide to initiate you at the University
of Hell fraternity.
On 7/31/08, Dev wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, atheists are the ones who are denigrating Martin Luther King
> (murdered by a Christian), Gandhi (murdered by a Hindu), Malcolm X
> (murdered by Muslims)…you guys know how to treat your own, I’ll tell
> you what.
>
> On Jul 31, 5:14 am, James Randall wrote:
> > Why do you say that the Christian church and the Bible are
> > discouraging independant thought and are trying to turn all of the
> > world into sheep?
> >
> > That’s a lie!
> >
> > We do NOT try to make everyone become sheep and think the same way.
> >
> > And why do you think that the more educated you become, the less
> > likely you are to become religious?
> > Are you then assuming that Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, and
> > many other figures in history, are all uneducated, brainwashed “lambs
> > of god”?
> >
> > What about Georges Lemaitre, the man who concieved the Big Bang
> > Theory? He was a Catholic Priest!
> > Oh, SURE, he was an educated, delusional sheep! (sarcasm)
> >
> > If you Atheists are as “educated” as you all humbly say you are, DON’T
> > use lies as an argument against us!
> >
>
Posted on July 31st, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
She didn’t make him feel like a turd, she agreed that she was a dog
and said “yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their
masters’ table.” So he said that because her faith was great even
though she was a dog he would help her. What an pompous ass. Folks try
to make excuses for that passage but there is no other way to
interpret it. It’s like folks’ brains get cloudy when they read the
Bible and miss the content. Hate and intolerance are mistaken for
love.
On Jul 31, 8:44 pm, Dromedaryhump1 wrote:
> Huck,
> yes.., in Mark7:
> Pretty uncaring and rude of him, He was gonna let the greek pagan
> woman’s daughter stay posessed, heck, she wasn’t jewish what did he
> care..
> But she makes him feel like a turd with a good come back, and he
> acquieses.
>
> You’d think he could have avoided giving her insult and cheap abuse
> and just done what was right.
> What a pri-k, eh?.
>
> Hump
> http://atheistcamel.blogspot.com/
>
> On Jul 31, 10:47 pm, hucktunes wrote:
>
> > He may not have been a murderer but he was a racist. Mark 21-28 states
> > that a foreign woman is no better than a dog and unworthy of his
> > consideration.
>
> > On Jul 31, 7:37 pm, Dromedaryhump1 wrote:
>
> > > Bob Crowley said: ” It did not give the fruit it was designed to give
> > > and
> > > therefore was condemned. ”
>
> > > As is typical of most Christians, bob doesn’t know sh-t from shiola
> > > about the bible.
> > > If he took the time to go back to the fig tree story, he’d see that
> > > the fig tree could NOT have born fruit. The story specifically
> > > says… IT WAS OUT OF SEASON!!!
>
> > > Here..read it:
> > > Mark 11: 12 when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the
> > > time of figs was not yet.
>
> > > I reiterate: Think first, type second.
>
> > > Humphttp://atheistcamel.blogspot.com/
>
> > > On Jul 31, 7:22 pm, Bob Crowley wrote:
>
> > > > If Christ is God in the flesh, and withdraws life from that particular
> > > > fig tree, He has done no more or less than He does when any tree
> > > > dies. All He did in this particular case was to make, first, His
> > > > power known, and second, use the fig tree as a parable for Israel
> > > > itself. It did not give the fruit it was designed to give and
> > > > therefore was condemned.
>
> > > > Any time a tree buds, grows and dies of natural causes, God is the one
> > > > who set the process in motion. Therefore the killing of the fig tree
> > > > was no different to the death of any other tree, except that it
> > > > withered to the roots overnight.
>
> > > > On Aug 1, 7:44 am, Aidan wrote:
>
> > > > > This post is surely going to be regarded as controversial, and I
> > > > > apologize for any dispute that may occur, but I find that this is
> > > > > important to acknowledge with the Christian members of this group (for
> > > > > I am an atheist). We have all surely been familiarized with Jesus
> > > > > Christ, I imagine. He bears overwhelming significance to over half of
> > > > > all Americans and Francophone Canadiennes, not to mention many other
> > > > > individuals from all walks of life.
>
> > > > > I am also sure we have all been familiarized that Jesus was supposedly
> > > > > sinless, holy, and perfect.
>
> > > > > However, ponder this alarming fact, and tell me what you think:
>
> > > > > Although I am too lazy to refer and record the precise Bible verse, I
> > > > > am cognizant that it is somewhere in Matthew (New Testament). You nay
> > > > > recall Jesus walking with his disciples to Jerusalem. Jesus went to
> > > > > get either a fig or an olive off a nearby tree (I forget which type of
> > > > > tree it was, but it was one of those two alternatives I am sure), but
> > > > > alas, no fruit was present. Jesus cursed the tree, and said may nobody
> > > > > ever eat off you again. He then to (which is also invalid… think of
> > > > > amputees, but that is a separate topic). When they returned from
> > > > > Jerusalem, one of the members in the party of thirteen was astonished
> > > > > that the olive tree was all frizzled up, and as it produced no more
> > > > > fruit, it cannot reproduce, and we can assume that it was dead.
>
> > > > > So, as Jesus essentially or practically “murdered” a living organism,
> > > > > does this not mean he sinned against God, which he is a part of? Does
> > > > > this not contradict the teachings of the Holy Bible, which actually
> > > > > occurs frequently?
>
> > > > > Think rationally. If Jesus murders, than what sections of the Bible
> > > > > can be validated if the Holy God sins?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text — Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -