You are looking at posts that were written in the month of May in the year 2008.
Posted on May 31st, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
OK, so you’re a Canadian. Your’e still a fuckin’ idiot though. Money
is money & unless I got it wrong, one can’t trade with bottle tops. I
can just imagine American atheists trying to pay their taxes with
‘christ only know what’. (Pun intended)
Max
On Jun 1, 10:52 am, omprem wrote:
> It may come as a surprise to you, but I am thankfully not a Merkin.
>
> On May 31, 9:06 pm, Max wrote:
>
> > A typical narrow minded American God botherer’s intellect on display.
> > The world is not that which is south of Canada & north of Mexico you
> > fuckin’ idiot. When I spend a dollar, it ain’t one of yours with the
> > ‘dicky’ references to sky daddies or pyramids with an evil eye either.
>
> > You really are a fuckin’ throwback.
>
> > Max
>
> > On Jun 1, 2:50 am, omprem wrote:
>
> > > You got to love it that every time the Merkin atheists on this board
> > > spend a penny, or a dollar, they are repeating the affirmation, “IN
> > > GOD
> > > WE TRUST”. If they were true to their rabid convictions they would
> > > give up money all together. But no one ever accused atheists of having
> > > the courage of their convictions.
Posted on May 31st, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
He sometimes still goes by Joseph Geloso (or “Joe” on ACRD) and we
assume that’s his real name because it’s the only name that sounded
like a real name (that we know of) and it’s the first name he used
(that we know of). I remember TheOtherSideOfHere and SynthesisOne off
the top of my head but he’s gone through several others that I can’t
remember, and bragged about having even more that weren’t caught but
he must not have used those very much because he’s so easy to catch.
LOL, some of us have been posting on this group for way too long. But
it’s more fun to rag on thetards you’ve developed a history with. :)
On May 31, 7:49 pm, Dag Yo wrote:
> Btw, any idea what Geloso’s first name is?
>
> On May 31, 4:45 pm, Dev wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hmmm…checking up on our friends at ACRD…
>
> > Read this little gem:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/a-civil-religious-debate/browse_frm/th…
>
> > A good portion of the group, despite the fact that it’s been around
> > for months now, is still the same fucktards arguing over the
> > definition of “civility”.
>
> > Actually, just visit the group. You’ll laugh.
>
> > Mainly Mike, Deidzoeb and Geloso (although I see Brock and omprem) in
> > a three-way wank–maybe a four-way wank, but scooter has pointed out
> > that Wanderer is probably Geloso with a new identity (which makes the
> > above thread even funnier when you consider it’s mostly Geloso and
> > Wanderer arguing).
>
> > ACRD makes me so full of myself I can’t stand me. I told these
> > fucktards to fuck off and start their own damn group, and months later
> > they’re still desperately trying to make it work amongst themselves
> > out of spite for me and us “mean” atheists. Mike and Deid were a pain
> > in the ass for me because I couldn’t shake the need to take sense into
> > otherwise intelligent posters who were giving them too much credit–
> > now they seem to be floating in an ocean in a little raft with a few
> > of our stupidest thetards, in search of The New World. Boy, when I’m
> > right about someone am I ever right.
>
> > I had forgotten how funny it all is, since bonfly isn’t around anymore
> > to remind me. When I posted the “Atheism vs. Christianity for
> > Dumbasses” post, I never in my wildest dreams imagined a few of them
> > would rename it, inhabit it, and still desperately cling to it (having
> > made no progress whatsoever) nearly four months later just to try and
> > prove some stupid point.
>
> > :D
>
> > On May 31, 2:59 pm, Dag Yo wrote:
>
> > > I hardly see a need. If any of those people would enjoy an actual
> > > debate about atheism they are welcome to show up here and act civilly
> > > and will be treated in kind. The fact of the matter is that we are
> > > well aware of that group and it’s full of twits who posted dishonest
> > > twaddle on here and then started that because they got their feelings
> > > hurt when people pointed out that they were liars and acting stupid.
>
> > > If for some reason you doubt that a civil discourse can be carried on
> > > here, then pick a topic and I’ll happily discuss it with you (i’m an
> > > atheist btw, and I gather you’re catholic, so that might make for a
> > > good starting point).
>
> > > On May 31, 12:52 pm, Wanderer wrote:
>
> > > > On May 31, 3:47 pm, Dag Yo wrote:
>
> > > > > That group is for religious debates. NONE of the posters on their are
> > > > > interested in a “theism vs atheism” debate, which is something that
> > > > > several of us might actually enjoy if it happened.
>
> > > > To the contrary, there are a lot of atheists in there as well as
> > > > theists. Go in and find out the truth.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text — Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -