Posted on April 30th, 2008 by admin.
Categories: Ranting.
> And you learned this where?
Simple. Christian mythology shares a good many features with other
mythologies being put forward at that time and earlier in the same
general geographical areas as the Christian mythology developed out
of. And while there are plenty of imaginable explanations for why
this might be case, the most likely explanation for why it is the case
is to say that Jesus really was:
> >Probably something in-between. An amalgam of characters, both real and
> >fictional, whose exploits (also both real and fictional) were combined
> >into a single image, exagerated, then made the mascot of a cult.
If you do have reasons for thinking that this might be incorrect, then
by all means please present them to us. I’m happy to hear whatever
you have in mind.
-
On Apr 30, 8:05 pm, jake wrote:
> >Probably something in-between. An amalgam of characters, both real and
> >fictional, whose exploits (also both real and fictional) were combined
> >into a single image, exagerated, then made the mascot of a cult.
>
> And you learned this where?
0 comments.
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.